Bad debt: capitalism's vampire

I have been noodling over the role of bad debt in monetary frameworks. Here is where I currently am at.

Out of nothing comes debt and cash. A bank starts with zero, lends you 100, you owe 100, the 100 will be destroyed when the debt is repaid.

Forget for a moment that banks charge interest out of this phantom money (5%/year) and that this right there is proof positive of the endogenous creation of money.

In case the debt is defaulted on (bad debt) then several interesting things happen
1/ money in circulation, keeps in circulation, it is not taken back from the system. You sort of have this build up of monetary gunk in the system. That money has an inflationary contribution
2/ Senior debt to capital. In case of bad debt at a company, creditors are senior to equity holders. So those that provided debt coming out of nothing will be able to raid equity and have seniority on cash flows over equity capital.

It is the second bit that I find really really disturbing. Fake money, or credit money, not backed by real deposit but by the endogenous creation of money by the banks (meaning it never existed) ceases to be an innocuous presence when it goes bad. By senior status of debt in the capital structure, it start "vampiring" real capital.

Fake money will start devouring real money in case of bad debt by senior status.

I am turning rapidly marxist on these monetary topics. Marx was not anti-capital, he was anti-debt. Banks are vampires of capital. Debtism kills capitalism.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting... if I read this often enough it eventually starts to make sense to me.

and here I agree with you - debt is eating real real capital. Nothing burns my butt more than to think of stock holders being wiped out - while the nincompoop managers (and creditors) live to eat salad another day.

And after digesting this blog post it heats me up even more!

I'm curious though. I don't think it was set up this way just because it's "the natural order of things". I don't recall any Adam Smith thoughts on this structure.

but it was set up this way. some how, some time, some where. right?

I wonder what the history of that looks like. Any idea where I could go to look at that? Is it simply a document or an operating manual or is it, in fact and after all... "just the way it is"?

and thanks for your blog. I'm learning about and thinking about things I didn't know existed.
March 21, 2009 at 7:18:00 AM PDT
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

$6.66B for BEA: Larry goes Shopping

Oracle has made a $17 per share offer to buy BEA. This putting a somewhat theatrical "number of the beast" valuation on BEA. Yesterday the stock was sitting at $13 and this morning it is at 18 and change representing a 30% jump. Obviously the crazy dude over at BEA is going to put up at least a simulacrum of a fight. Thinking of it, I expect Alfred "I am compensating for..." to put a heartfelt final battle into this, he has probably already super-glued his naked chest to the BEA boardroom table. It is going to get nasty and he will be dragged out kicking and screaming. Alfred will mumble something about not wanting to be Larry's power point bitch, or waxing his boat, or some other non-sense. But Larry is going to make sushi of that board and will feed it to the koi fish he has in his compound and cost more per head than Alfred's car... This one is going to be funny to watch. Pass the popcorn please. First, because of ICahn's shareholder activism, th
Read more

Thug vs Thug: Porsche 1, Hedge Funds: 0

The latest drama is fun. VW became the largest company in the world, in terms of market cap, ahead of EXXON on a little financial market coup d'etat orchestrated by Porsche. Apparently VW stocks was on the way down, I don't know the details but many Hedge Funds (HF) were short the position. Fine. The price goes down. Porsche starts buying the anonymous float (and probably some private too?), but the point is they build a 73% market share without many people noticing. In the US you would need disclosure after 10% or so. Point is, that many HF wake up and realize that their short position is about to lose a lot of money. So what do they do? those idiots? they short cover all together, which means they buy the stock to cover the short. The stock zooms up, by a full multiplier and overtakes EXXON. Porsche makes A KILLING in the process and has robbed the city robbers to the tune of "potentially $30B". Not bad for a days worth of work. PS: hey, psst Porsche! With t
Read more

Quickies #3, protecting IP in OSS

Now enjoying my status as a sage of the industry, which is to say I am older than 20, but alas, not a billionaire, God fuck-it; people are all the time asking me for nuggets of wisdom from my vast experience at the top. Quickies from marcf #3: What IP is there to protect in OSS? B.D asks: "marcf, my open source project is starting to enjoy a measure of success, I am thinking of going professional with it, I am thinking about business models. How much thought should I put in protecting my Intellectual Property?" Answer: B.D. protecting IP in OSS is extremelly important. The only "private" property that exists in OSS are 1- brand 2- URL. Both are obviously related but really you need to protect your brand name, in other words REGISTER your trademarks, use them, declare they are yours and enforce the trademark, meaning protect against infringement. Other products, specifically based on your product should not include your name. Consultancies will be able to say the
Read more