The pawnbroker of last resort

Today was a big day in the markets with the FED announcing the creation of a new facility called the Term Securities Lending Facility. That is a mouthful that I can't remember. The dow surged 400points. Euphoria and relief. Some see it as the decisive FED intervention to resolve the credit crisis, others are already deriding it as a bailout that will ultimately cost the taxpayers. Me, I am just trying to make sense of it all, not exactly in real time but almost. This blog by Steve Waldman has greatly helped me get up to speed. I love the way this guy writes, very clear.

A refresh: the credit markets have been paralyzed since June 07 when the subprime losses started appearing. Housing collapses, prices go down, defaults spike, collateral damage is estimated at $300Bn. Damage is everywhere, no one know where. Interbank rates spike on 3 occasions reflecting the facts that the banks themselves don't know. Bank balance sheet take hits, leverage goes in reverse, credit markets freeze. The hit is compounded by illiquid assets that are accounted on "mark to market". Bigger writedowns driven by accounting. The banks in turn deleverage the hedges (aug 07). Markets have repeated barfs. Large portions of the banking system are suspected to be insolvent. Loop around one more time, actually two more times adn you reach now in the timeline. Are you scared yet?

The role of the FED is to safeguard the banking system by providing liquidity. They do so by lending cash. The FED is usually known as the lender of last resort.

The problem with the monetary policy of 'lender' is that it puts inflationary pressure on the economy. So Ben Bernanke has created a new facility that instead of injecting cash, essentially swaps assets. It is called "sterilized intervention". The FED is being dubbed the pawnbroker of last resort (via naked capitalism). By swapping illiquid assets, the mortgage based agency originated paper, for highly liquid T-Bills, the Fed are providing ample LIQUIDITY to the system.

The technicality is a tad more advanced: they give t-bonds, the t-bonds need to be repaid in 28 days. The collateral is WHATEVER (AAA subprime included). So the banks can now have some cash, they don't pay much for that honor and they have replaced even if temporarily, their illiquid subprime by cash. Of course, what happens with these short term debts is that they are rolled over and so the terms are extended as long as necessary.

But the net result is the same and the beauty of it? It creates liquidity but it doesn't add to inflation (hence the sterilized moniker). In fact it actually takes some money out of circulation in the form of interest payments. Some call the Bernanke tactic "monetary policy on the asset side of the balance sheet" (great blog: Paul Krugman of NYT). See Krugman, who seems to be a professor of econ at MIT? for wonkish explanations of Tobin equilibriums that explains all of this. I still have to understand ONE of those position diagrams and what they mean, so if a kind soul would be as good as to explain to me what tobin diagram mean, I would be for ever grateful. Last friday he criticized the FED by doing "too little" arguing that "sterilized intervention" while dramatic was usually unable to move the markets because they were too small. They really only served as a psychological slap to get markets back to reality. He was dubious as he said "this is the third slap in the face and it is scary". This time all he says is "half the FED reserve is committed (400bn), wow" (sic).

In other words, I read this as the most serious attempt to control this mess, the bet the bank intervention. If all goes according to plan: banks post collateral, get the tbonds, get the cash, shore up their sheets, start lending to each other, to others, stop clobbering baby hedge-funds, which in turn stop barfing in the stock market, the banks are saved, the markets stabilize, confidence is restored and there is a happy finish to this crisis. And if that $400Bn is not enough then there is more from where that came from according to the FED.

Nightmare scenario is subprime continues to wipe out money, the additional 400 isn't enough to cover the banks losses so they continue deleveraging, hedgies dies, markets tank, banks over-run the capacity of the FED to absorb the mess (1Tr) and print money on top. Of course that later scenario seems unrealistic as it will continue to swap illiquid assets for liquid ones until it runs out. So far a 20% decline in housing is 400Bn of losses so we would have to do 50% decline for the FED to really start sweating.

The banking industry has a market value of 2T so 400Bn represents... 20%. Interfluidity makes the point that since the debt roll over, the debt is factually equivalent to equity (where the repayment is the decision of the debtor: the FED are not going to redeem the money in 28 days, that is the whole point) and so the banks are being nationalized... 28 days later...

In the meantime, I feel like I am watching Star-wars, O-Benwan Bernbanker is our only hope and so far, despite the criticism, he is rising to the challenge and impressing a bunch of people who actually know what they are talking about. Me I am just in awe!

Comments

Andrew Meyer said…
Professor Krugman is a professor of economics at Princton. Note that Ben Bernanke was the chairman of economics at Princton and yes, the two of them are good friends.

Interesting side note, if you ever see Krugman speak, he will use a line something like "In the interests of full disclosure I have to tell you that before he was demoted, Ben Bernanke was the chairman..."
Anonymous said…
I believe Krugman's references to Tobin would be a ref to the Tobit Model... though I haven't read Krugman's analysis, so this is a guess.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobit_model

Yes, very, very wonkish.
adt43wt342 said…
Anonymous, thanks I had read the Tobit model, the particular stuff I needed help with is in this article by Krugman:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/08/whats-ben-doing-very-wonkish/

You see the diagrams? what do they mean? I understand an axis is the rate of return of treasuries, another axis is the rate of return of securities. I seem to understand that the lines represent "market clearing". I would like to be walked, by one of you guys on how to understand "if rt is less than equilibrium then: this and that", basically I don't know what the diagrams MEAN.

PS: With these diagrams Krugman visually argues for a vicious spiral in the normal monetary policy intervention.
adt43wt342 said…
Andrew,

LOL. That's hysterical. I just watched a video of him on "colbert report" he comes across as a really shy guy. I like him.
adt43wt342 said…
ah shoot, the url is cut.

I will put a diagram in the body of the blog
Roy Russo said…
... and this entire mess attributed to people that thought buying that run-down shack in Miami for $2m was a wise investment, using an interest-only loan with bad credit ratings. Clearly, government schools have failed us, when people can't read the terms sitting in front of them (or hire a lawyer to read it for *you*).

Fed meeting next week... expect to see more medicine. Heck, they're already $400b in to the bailout...
adt43wt342 said…
Roy,

I just picked up your next book yesterday at Barnes and Noble:
"The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" by John Maynard Keynes.

You know it deals with govt intervention, socialism in deep recessions and all the crackpot theories that 1930's america applied that take hold when "invisible handjobs" don't work like they are supposed to anymore and the govt needs to intervene. Instead of spending programs we are seeing a nationalization of the banking system, according to the BNP, it is already happened.
Roy Russo said…
Marc,

Already read it. Keynes arguments made sense in the 30s (his theories mainly revolve around a closed economy). His idea was that deficit-financing and interventionist policies would remedy the depression. I think theres debate over what actually fixed the problem - perhaps a combination of factors.

What caused the depression, is more important - bad monetary policy and protectionism. Is it that different today? The Fed made money cheap. Cheap money landed in the hands of the drunken sailors. So now its time for the hangover. The Fed deserves blame for the mess we're in today. Praise them on the bailout, flame them for not stepping in sooner (thats their job, isn't it?).

Read Milton Friedman's writings for a modern-day economic visionary. ;-)
adt43wt342 said…
Nah,

it is all dubya...
Anonymous said…
85cc免費影城85cc免費影片免費 a 片台灣論壇免費影片線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞a片免費看免費A片A片-sex52085cc免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片免費a片卡通sex888影片分享區520sex貼片區aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片sex520免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費色咪咪影片網成人a影片論壇免費影片下載aaaaaa片俱樂部sex520免費影片sex888免費看影片馬子免費影片免費線上a片gogo2sexaaa片免費看短片免費 a 片aaa片免費看短片免費線上avdvd成人圖片區18成人avoooaaa的滿18歲卡通影片免費線上歐美A片觀看sexdiy影城plus論壇dudu sex免費影片85cc成人影城臺灣情色網線上免費a長片免費卡通影片線上觀看彩虹頻道免費影片洪爺影城浪漫月光論壇bbs x693 com sex888 sex383線上娛樂場85cc免費影片sex888 freebbs hksogo 成人論壇sex999日本美女寫真集日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞微風成人av論壇aaaa 片俱樂部免費影片下載a亞洲免費影片線上直播卡通美女a片免費試看免費成人視訊視訊情色遊戲援交av080影片sexdiy影城sex520免費影片sex888movie影城情色小說 杜蕾斯成人一本道 a片 東京熱情色影片本土辣妹34c影片直播吉澤明步sex888免費看影片論壇a 免費影片觀賞aa的滿18歲影片av080免費試看sex888 freebbs hk免費aa片試看免費影片觀賞av博物館aaa免費看影片亞洲禁果影城免費a片aaaaa片俱樂部影片5278論壇金瓶影片交流區383movie成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播免費a片線上觀看,sex520貼片ut13077視訊聊天avdvd無碼情色電影日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞台南援交友留言hi5 tv免費影片1314視訊成人論壇成人免費視訊 完美女人hilive tv 免費電影34c蒼井空影片下載avdvdsex383線上娛樂場aio交友愛情館sex383線上娛樂場JP成人網免費視訊聊天室微風成人

Popular posts from this blog

Thug vs Thug: Porsche 1, Hedge Funds: 0

Madrid Blog--We get sued

Houston, We have a central-bank-run!