Quickies #5: GPL or BSD?

Now enjoying my status as a sage of the industry, which is to say I am older than 20, but alas, not a billionaire, God fuck-it; people are all the time asking me for nuggets of wisdom from my vast experience at the top.

Quickies from MF: #5 GPL or BSD?

D.B writes in. "Marc, I am about to launch a project in open source, we have invested a good man year in developing it and I want to know what license I should use for the project."

Answer. D, you can't imagine how many versions of this question I have seen over time. It is also a polarizing question. People care about their licenses and many a flame war have resulted from passionate debate about the benefits of each.

The quick answer however is that IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER.

The longer answer is that it doesn't really matter because the ultimate license scheme for OSS is still RHEL/Fedora: a proprietary distribution of OSS software. It doesn't matter if the software inside is GPL/BSD or whatever. Realistically speaking however, RHEL/FEDORA is not an option for young projects, this is only viable for established products and may snuff your growth in the early stages.

Historically, the bigger projects to drive commercialization of OSS have been based on GPL/LGPL, MySQL, Linux, JBoss. It may be because GPL and derivates offer you a measure of protection by requiring reciprocity. Your user community, specifically the ISV's, either contribute code back or take out a dual license to avoid the requirements of the GPL. With dual licensing you track your ISV community from the beginning and quickly build revenue streams. It is a good thing if you intend to go professional with your project.

BSD derivatives on the other hand, provide the competition with the right to cherry pick your stuff and not give anything back, not money, not code. Think about how OSX has displaced Linux on the desktop by using its BSD variants. A proprietary vendor got the monetary benefit of the work of OSS legions, not the OSS legions. As a general rule of thumb, reciprocal licenses (GPL) help the developer make a living, academic licenses (BSD) help the competing vendor.

At the end of the day the argument is also one of philosophical taste. I say the GPL is great because it enables individual developers to grow businesses fast on dual licensing. Others may prefer the more permissive approach of letting anyone do whatever they please with their code.

But again, I have seen many a brother and sister get fanatical about these issues, and waste energy on the wrong discussions when truly, they are important but not paramount. Good code will prevail.

MF

Comments

Bill Pyne said…
Marc,

You are giving this hard-earned knowledge away. You should charge for it! Possibly go on speaking tours. What kind of businessperson gives knowledge away?
Anonymous said…
People always ask this question the wrong way. It should be here's my business model, now what license should I choose? You are correct that for most who want to start a sw business they should go the dual license model and use GPL. That way they can start a community (the GPL requires that they contribute back changes to the community), derive benefits from having the community add features / fix bugs and generate revenue from commercial licenses from those who don't want to contribute. For others who just want to see the proliferation of technology (like TCP/IP, JXTA etc) they should use BSD / Apache style licenses that don't place any restrictions on use or contribution.
adt43wt342 said…
Bill,

You are right. I should charge for this stuff. But then again, when I started giving away JBoss people some folks were saying "why"... the answer was "because I can"
adt43wt342 said…
Kdraks,

I would probably agree with you, if you don't care to every monetize your code then public domain is even a better choice. I like the cleanliness of some of the Creative commons licenses: if you are commercial, you pay. Makes sense. In the GPL we achieve this effect indirectly by triggering GPL on redistribution, it is a technicality and the goal is not explicit.
Unknown said…
I used to think that LGPL or GPL + E was the "uber" license. Now I agree with you. It doesn't matter. Source code is worthless for a business, what matters is the brand.
adt43wt342 said…
Bill,

I assume Burke not Gates :)

Precisely. The brand comes from good code and community, and community usually follows good code but not always :) The arguments that BSD or GPL increase your community appeal or adoption to me are theoretical hogwash. In practice you get massive adoption of GPL/LGPL and BSD.

And if that is the case, that the license don't help or hinder your adoption, depending on your type of library, you might as well derive a revenue from the redistribution.

Starving poet was never my thing.
Matt Asay said…
Marc, Marc, Marc. We don't have to quibble about the RHEL/Fedora model because of its parent, but I strongly disagree that it doesn't work in the early stages of a company. Alfresco has done exceptionally well with that model. It gets the product out and gives a reason for customers to pay.

Other than that, though, great insight (as usual).
adt43wt342 said…
Matt,

Last I checked Alfresco was a classical on-ramp model. You offer additional bits under proprietary licenses. This is different from "the same bits under proprietary licenses".

Of course, feel free to correct me if this is not factual.

On-ramp models are of course very beneficial for young companies because they supplement revenues from the get go.
Botchagalupe said…
Alas, I am way older than 20 and not even yet a millionaire. However, I have been grinding this shit for 30 years and I am pretty sure it doesn't matter as well. Building, supporting and nurturing something that is better than anyone else's is IMHO the only thing that really matters.

johnmwillis.com
Anonymous said…
I think redhat not allowing downloads of the binaries for JbossAS 5 is a mistake. With the competition out there from glassfish and geronimo making it harder to get a working jboss appserver up and running makes no sense. I work for a fortune 10 company (not that i'm bragging but just wanted to point out that we are pretty big) and for most new projects we use outside vendors to do the development work. At this point very few of them use jboss. They usually just try to get by using tomcat but they also will write code for websphere and weblogic. Rarely are we offered an option of using jboss by the vendors and if the business people don't see it listed as an option they rarely push for it because they know it will probably be more expensive and take longer to implement.

I'm on a team trying to change that. My team is trying to push the business to using jboss as opposed to weblogic and websphere but unless the vendor has easy access to the binaries this makes using jboss less likely than it already is, which is pretty low.

I was very upset to learn about the change in the model for jboss about a year ago because I knew it would make it even harder for new jboss projects to get started. Unless it is extremely easy to build from source or a centos-like project is setup that offers binaries for it I see the new model for jboss 5 keeping jboss' usage at my company down at the bottom. Way behind the usage for websphere and weblogic.

Maybe the new model is the right move overall but it may have caused jboss at my company to end up DOA.
Anonymous said…
85cc免費影城85cc免費影片免費 a 片台灣論壇免費影片線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞a片免費看免費A片A片-sex52085cc免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片免費a片卡通sex888影片分享區520sex貼片區aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片sex520免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費色咪咪影片網成人a影片論壇免費影片下載aaaaaa片俱樂部sex520免費影片sex888免費看影片馬子免費影片免費線上a片gogo2sexaaa片免費看短片免費 a 片aaa片免費看短片免費線上avdvd成人圖片區18成人avoooaaa的滿18歲卡通影片免費線上歐美A片觀看sexdiy影城plus論壇dudu sex免費影片85cc成人影城臺灣情色網線上免費a長片免費卡通影片線上觀看彩虹頻道免費影片洪爺影城浪漫月光論壇bbs x693 com sex888 sex383線上娛樂場85cc免費影片sex888 freebbs hksogo 成人論壇sex999日本美女寫真集日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞微風成人av論壇aaaa 片俱樂部免費影片下載a亞洲免費影片線上直播卡通美女a片免費試看免費成人視訊視訊情色遊戲援交av080影片sexdiy影城sex520免費影片sex888movie影城情色小說 杜蕾斯成人一本道 a片 東京熱情色影片本土辣妹34c影片直播吉澤明步sex888免費看影片論壇a 免費影片觀賞aa的滿18歲影片av080免費試看sex888 freebbs hk免費aa片試看免費影片觀賞av博物館aaa免費看影片亞洲禁果影城免費a片aaaaa片俱樂部影片5278論壇金瓶影片交流區383movie成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播免費a片線上觀看,sex520貼片ut13077視訊聊天avdvd無碼情色電影日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞台南援交友留言hi5 tv免費影片1314視訊成人論壇成人免費視訊 完美女人hilive tv 免費電影34c蒼井空影片下載avdvdsex383線上娛樂場aio交友愛情館sex383線上娛樂場JP成人網免費視訊聊天室微風成人

Popular posts from this blog

Thug vs Thug: Porsche 1, Hedge Funds: 0

Madrid Blog--We get sued

Houston, We have a central-bank-run!