"Margin spirals", non-linearity and "band-aid" theories


From the weekend FT, by Krishna Guha, a fairly comprehensive review of the continuing credit market woes and the desperate attempts of the FED. I will actually skip on the analysis of the FED action and focus on the dynamics.

From the FT

Fed officials see a double squeeze taking place, with banks pulling back on their capital at risk in the face of balance sheet strains, while hedge funds and other investment vehicles are being forced to deleverage and sell assets amid margin calls from anxious lenders.

Distress sales by funds have in turn pushed asset prices lower, triggering fresh rounds of margin calls - a so-called "margin spiral".


Feedback loops, known sources of non-linearity in physics are known in economy as "downward spirals", "vicious circles" when the markets go down and "virtuous circles", when they go up. The strategy of "momentum investing", up attracts up, down attract down, while mostly psychology driven finds its roots in this mathematical feedback a.k.a non-linearity.

In physics they are well understood in phase transition phenomenas for example. They are usually violently dynamic events, driven by thermodynamics and are really "transitional dynamics". The system transitions from an equilibrium at higher energies, to a lower equilibrium and does so very fast. Think of a pin resting on its head, in theory it could rest at equilibrium, in practice a slight push will beget more push (gravity is not balanced on the axis) and the pin falls.

What if the deleveraging is a new equilibrium. If M2/debt/money is energy (to be invested) then the violent deleveraging is driving these transitions. We are transitioning to a lower M2 level, less leverage. Then let non-linearities, the feedback loops, HELP IN THE TRANSITION. They are not intrisically wrong they are part of the dynamics.

In fact they may be beneficial. Just finished Greenspan's book, in there he has a rather damning analysis of the policy of the Japanese govt and the banks during the 90's credit and housing crisis. No one wanted to lose face, so the losses were slow to be recognized and so the transition took forever because of intervention and banks not calling in the loans, waiting for a recovery, which never materialized. It took them 10 years of recession and deflation to get out of it.

Last week was full of such calls by analysts and wall street pros: basically calling t to the FED to save them, bail them out. Arguments usually focused on non-linear phenomenas resorting to scare tactics. Obviously, non-linear dynamics can lead to "breakdowns" as opposed to new equilibriums. Avoiding breakdowns (bank run?) is desirable, but who is to call them? many of them may be benign even beneficial. Over-meddling with the spirals, altering the natural dynamics of a self-adjusting market may not be.

Assuming there is a new equilibrium after deleverage of M2, as opposed to a systemic breakdown, getting there as quickly as possible is the best thing we can do. The spirals are getting us there in a hurry.

That is where the band-aid analogy comes in, not the applying the band-aid, but actually removing the band-aid: it hurts, but the faster you do it the better. Of course if by removing the band-aid you remove a pound of flesh with it, and you systemically kill the patient, then it is not good. Until we figure which is which, can we sustain the screams?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Uniquely interesting blog; a good read.
adt43wt342 said…
thanks,
does that read "A typical" or "Atypical", maybe you mean it as a pun?
Wayt said…
I think what we're seeing is a vicious cycle of de-leveraging in securitized debt that the fed is powerless to stop. The only "cure" is for the banks who will end up with these crap securities on their balance sheets to take their medicine quickly, mark the value of these securities down to their true new value (far lower than they have thus far), and let the chips (and insolvencies) fall where they may. If we delay the inevitable markdown, we risk stagnation akin to Japan's 10 years of hell in the 90s.

In the meantime, the Fed has mistakenly (IMHO) tried to stop the bleeding by lowering rates. But the Fed is impotent - it can SLOW the pace of markdowns but not STOP them. It's misguided easing is helping to inflate yet another bubble just as the credit bubble is deflating. The new bubble is in commodities (gold, oil, corn, ...). When will the new commodities bubble burst? Who knows, but some day it WILL burst, as all bubbles must.

Wayt
adt43wt342 said…
Wayt,

I think it is the markdowns themselves that are triggering the crisis. Illiquidity begets artificially low market prices, begets mark to market markdowns begets more illiquidity... is this a good spiral? Are they "real" losses. The only real losses were the subprime ones, today banks are forcing losses at hedges and cashing in the collateral at crap prices which will revert back to real prices when the dust settles. The banks will have bullied the hedgies into covering for their bad subprime losses. Way to spread the damage!
Anonymous said…
85cc免費影城85cc免費影片免費 a 片台灣論壇免費影片線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞a片免費看免費A片A片-sex52085cc免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片免費a片卡通sex888影片分享區520sex貼片區aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片sex520免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費色咪咪影片網成人a影片論壇免費影片下載aaaaaa片俱樂部sex520免費影片sex888免費看影片馬子免費影片免費線上a片gogo2sexaaa片免費看短片免費 a 片aaa片免費看短片免費線上avdvd成人圖片區18成人avoooaaa的滿18歲卡通影片免費線上歐美A片觀看sexdiy影城plus論壇dudu sex免費影片85cc成人影城臺灣情色網線上免費a長片免費卡通影片線上觀看彩虹頻道免費影片洪爺影城浪漫月光論壇bbs x693 com sex888 sex383線上娛樂場85cc免費影片sex888 freebbs hksogo 成人論壇sex999日本美女寫真集日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞微風成人av論壇aaaa 片俱樂部免費影片下載a亞洲免費影片線上直播卡通美女a片免費試看免費成人視訊視訊情色遊戲援交av080影片sexdiy影城sex520免費影片sex888movie影城情色小說 杜蕾斯成人一本道 a片 東京熱情色影片本土辣妹34c影片直播吉澤明步sex888免費看影片論壇a 免費影片觀賞aa的滿18歲影片av080免費試看sex888 freebbs hk免費aa片試看免費影片觀賞av博物館aaa免費看影片亞洲禁果影城免費a片aaaaa片俱樂部影片5278論壇金瓶影片交流區383movie成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播免費a片線上觀看,sex520貼片ut13077視訊聊天avdvd無碼情色電影日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞台南援交友留言hi5 tv免費影片1314視訊成人論壇成人免費視訊 完美女人hilive tv 免費電影34c蒼井空影片下載avdvdsex383線上娛樂場aio交友愛情館sex383線上娛樂場JP成人網免費視訊聊天室微風成人

Popular posts from this blog

$6.66B for BEA: Larry goes Shopping

Thug vs Thug: Porsche 1, Hedge Funds: 0

Quickies #3, protecting IP in OSS